T-72
Russian Tank T72
See
Also:
T-34
T34 Soviet medium tank IS-2_Soviet_Tank, ISU-152, T-35
Soviet Heavy Tank, T-55
Tank, T-62
Soviet Medium Tank, T80
Main Battle Tank, T-90
Main Battle Tank T-72
Tank M60
Patton M1
Abrams M1A1 M1A2 Tank Tank
history WW1 WW2 List
of tanks WW1, WW2, Modern US
Army List of Tanks WW2 M4_Sherman US
Tank Production World War 2 WW2
German Tank Production Panzer
3 III, Panzer
4 IV Pz4, Tiger
1, King
Tiger 2 Maus
(Tank) - Panzer VIII WW2 world largest tank Matilda
Infantry Tank |
Contents
1 Production history
2 Design characteristics
2.1 Variants
3 Combat history
At least some technical
documentation on the T72 is known to have been passed to
the CIA by the Polish Colonel Ryszard Kuklinski.
Production history
The T-72 ( T72 )was the most common front-line
tank used by the Red Army from the 1970s to the collapse
of the Soviet Union. It was also exported to other Warsaw
Pact countries and several other countries such as
Finland, India, Iran, Iraq and Yugoslavia, as well as
being copied, both with and without licenses, in a number
of other countries.
The Yugoslavs called
their copy the M84, and sold thousands of them around the
world during the 1980s. The Iraqis called theirs the
Assad Babyl, which means "Lion of Babylon,"
though the Iraqis assembled theirs from "spare
parts" sold to them by the Russians as a means of
evading the UN-imposed weapons embargo). More modern
derivatives include the Polish PT-91 Twardy and Russian
T-90. Russian and Ukrainian industries also offer
modernization packages for older T-72s.
Various versions of the T-72 have been in production for
decades, and the specifications for its armor have
changed considerably. Early T72 tanks had homogenous cast
steel armor incorporated spaced armor technology and were
moderately well protected by the standards of the early
1970s. Around 1980, the Soviets began building the tanks
with composite armour similar to the Chobham armour used
in modern Western tanks, in the front of the turret and
the front of the hull. Late in the 1980s, T72 tanks in
Soviet inventory (and many of those elsewhere in the
world as well) were fitted with reactive armour tiles. It
is believed that since 1985, T-72 tanks in Russian
military service have been fitted with laser rangefinders
of French design; since 2000, some may have been fitted
with thermal imaging night-vision gear of French
manufacture as well (though this is less likely than that
they might simply use the locally manufactured
'Buran-Catherine' system, which incorporates a locally
manufactured version of the French AGAVA-2 thermal
sight). Depleted uranium armour-piercing ammunition for
the 125 mm gun has been manufactured in Russia in the
form of the BM-32 projectile since around 1978, though it
has never been deployed, and is less penetrative than the
later Tungsten BM-42, and the newer BM-42M, which
compares in penetrative ability to the German DM-53. The
T-72 with these enhancements and a skilled, motivated,
proficient crew is a formidable opponent even by 21st
Century standards, though it is not in the same class as
the most modern Western designs such as the M1 Abrams.
Therefore it is not uncommon around the world and is
found in the armies of many potential enemies of the US
and other Western nations. Many Western analysts regard
this as worrisome, due to the fact that, at least
theoretically, its 125 mm 2A46 main gun is capable of
destroying any modern main battle tank in the world
today, including the M1 Abrams. On the other hand, on
those three occasions when Soviet clients using T-72s
have met Western armies that possessed modern main battle
tanksLebanon in 1982, Kuwait in 1991, and Iraq in
2003the Syrians and Iraqis were heavily defeated,
although this might have more to do with the poor
training and low morale of their crews than with any
deficiencies in the T-72 itself. It might also be
mentioned that the versions these armies fielded were, in
either case, at least 30 years out of date at the time,
had not been significantly upgraded, were firing inferior
ammunition (often with steel penetrators and half-charges
of propellant).
Design characteristics
The T-72 exhibits many design features shared with other
tank designs of Soviet origin. Some of these are viewed
as deficiencies in a straight comparison to NATO tanks,
but most are a product of the way these tanks were
envisioned to be employed, based on the Soviets'
practical experiences in World War II.
Even the most recently produced T-72s are not especially
well protected (with the notable exception of the
T-72BM); NATO standard 120 mm/L60 guns firing the M829
series depleted uranium T72 APFSDS rounds, or German
Tungsten DM-53 can kill it on the first shot from any
angle out past two kilometers, and even the older NATO
standard 105 mm/L68 can do it at a kilometer or
moreat least with depleted uranium ammunition.
First generation reactive armour bricks improve
protection only slightly from APFSDS, but more so against
HEAT ammunition.
The 125 mm 2A46 series main gun is almost as powerful
(depending on the ammunition) as the NATO-standard 120
mm/L60 found in many modern Western MBTs (which is to
say, highly powerful and highly lethal, at least
theoretically capable of destroying any tank in the world
today at a kilometer or more), but its rate of fire
depends very much on the state of repair of the
autoloader, which is necessary due to the extremely small
and cramped interior space in the turret, which prevents
the addition of a fourth crew member as a loader. This
autoloader is based on the autoloader from the T-62
series with mechanical improvements, and is rather slow
and prone to malfunctions if not maintained properly. It
takes between seven and fifteen seconds to load a new
shell into the main gun, during which time the main gun
cannot be aimed due to the fact that the autoloader must
crank the gun up three degrees above the horizontal in
order to depress the breech end of the gun and line it up
with the new shell. Even with a laser rangefinder and a
ballistic computer final aiming takes at least another
three to five seconds. Even with a very proficient,
well-trained crew, a tank with such an autoloader in a
condition of poor maintenance (uncommon in elite or
guards tank regiments) can only fire approximately four
aimed shots per minute. In Western tanks with a human
loader, the loading process is much faster, only
requiring three to five secondsand the gunner can
aim the gun during this process and fire at the target
the instant the loader signals readiness. Modern Western
tanks can fire twelve to eighteen aimed shots per minute,
compared to the four of most Soviet and Russian
designsthough, of course, given the smoke and dust
on the battlefield, combined with the relatively poor
field of view afforded by even the most efficient and
modern periscopes or thermal sights, it is generally
regarded as unusual for a tank crew to be able to spot
four targets in a minute in most tactical situations
(though modern sensors such as thermal imaging sights are
changing this).
The vast majority of T-72s do not have FLIR thermal
imaging sights, though all T-72s (even those exported to
the Third World) possess the characteristic (and
inferior) 'luna' IR illuminator. Thermal imaging sights
are extremely expensive, and the new Russian FLIR system,
the 'Buran-Catherine Thermal Imaging Suite' was only
introduced recently on the T-80UM tank. Most T-72s found
outside the former Soviet Union do not have laser
rangefinders. And only the most modern Russian tanks
incorporate the ballistic computers that have been found
in Western tanks since the mid 1970s.
Finally, all Soviet and Russian tanks designed after the
Second World War are designed with relatively limited
angles of elevation available for the main gun. This is
due to the fact that the low profile of the tank and the
correspondingly low turret top cause the breech to
contact the top of the turret, inhibiting depression of
the gun (this was seen as a reasonable tradeoff for a low
profile). The main gun can only be depressed very
slightly from the horizontal, only a few
degreeswhich does not sound significant until you
recall that in defensive situations, the hull-down
position, with the tank parked just behind the crest of a
ridge and just the muzzle of its gun and part of its
turret visible to the anticipated target, have been
demonstrated to be highly important.
Western tanks have considerably more elevation range and
can be parked in a hull-down position with just the gun
and a tiny sliver of the turret showing, whereas Soviet
designs under most circumstances cannot take up a
hull-down position at all because they cannot depress
their guns far enough to park behind a ridge and shoot
down the hill. In the interest of fairness, the origin of
this shortcoming should be noted. The tactical doctrine
of the Soviet Union stressed offense over defense in war.
Therefore, it was not particularly important to the
Soviet designers that their tank be able to take a
defensive position for long periods. Contrast this with
the Western outlook evident in such tanks as the Leopard
2, the Leclerc, and the M1 Abrams, which were all
designed to fight a defensive war against the presumed
Soviet invasion of NATO.
Recent CIS export designs, intended to compete with
western tanks on the open market, have placed more
emphasis on defence and crew survivability. The Ukrainian
T-84-120 Oplot and Russian Black Eagle appear to have
superior gun depression, as well as armoured blow-out
ammunition compartments.
T72 models have been employed by Algeria, Angola,
Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Bosnia, Bulgaria, Croatia,
Czech Republic, Finland, Georgia, Hungary, India, Iran,
Iraq, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Libya, Poland, Romania,
Russia, Slovakia, Syria, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan,
Ukraine, Uzbekistan, Yugoslavia, United States (display,
tests).
Variants
T-72M1M of Polish Army
T-72M1M
T-72 - Original version, optical rangefinder.
T-72A - Added sideskirts, additional armour, laser
rangefinder, electronic fire control system, smoke
grenade launchers.
T72 B - Thicker armour, composite armour in front of
turret and front of hull.
T-72BK - Command version of T-72B, recognizable by having
multiple radio antennas.
T-72BV - Early explosive reactive armour added
T72 BM - Kontakt-5 explosive reactive armour, composite
armour in sides of turret as well, AT-11 "Svir"
laser-guided antitank missile
T-72M - Soviet export version, similar to T-72A (built
also in Poland and ex-Czechoslovakia)
T-72M1 - Soviet export version, with thicker armour
(built also in Poland and ex-Czechoslovakia)
M-84 - improved version produced in Yugoslavia, very
widely exported
Lion of Babylon tank - Iraqi-made version
PT-91 Twardy - a Polish tank based on T-72M1
T72 MP - modernization package for the T-72 by KMDB in
Ukraine, including improved engine, armour, and fire
control
T-72AG - KMDB modernization package, including improved
engine, armour, fire control, and main armament
T72 -120 - KMDB modernization package, including an
auto-loaded main gun capable of firing NATO 120 mm
ammunition or ATGM
Combat history
USSR: Afghanistan (1979-1989)
Iran, Iraq: Iran-Iraq War (1980-1988)
Syria: 1982 Lebanon War
Russia: Chechnya (1994-1996, 1999-2002)
Gulf Wars (1991, 2003)
Specifications |
|
Crew |
3 |
Combat
Weight (mt) |
44.5 |
Chassis
Length Overall (m) |
6.91 |
Height
Overall (m) |
2.19 |
Width
Overall (m) |
3.58 |
Ground
Pressure (kg/cm 2 ) |
0.90 |
Automotive
Performance |
|
Engine Type |
840-hp Diesel |
Cruising
Range (km) |
500/ 900 with external
tanks |
Speed
(km/h) |
|
Max Road |
60 |
Max
Off-Road |
45 |
Average
Cross-Country |
35 |
Max Swim |
N/A |
Fording
Depths (m) |
1.2 Unprepared/5.0 with
snorkel |
Radio |
R-173 and R-134 |
Protection |
|
Armor,
Turret Front (mm) |
520/950 against HEAT |
Applique
Armor (mm) |
Side of hull over track
skirt, turret top |
Explosive
Reactive Armor (mm) |
Kontakt or Kontakt-5 ERA |
Active
Protective System |
Arena available |
Mineclearing
Equipment |
Roller-plow set, and plows
available |
Self-Entrenching
Blade |
Yes |
NBC
Protection System |
Yes |
Smoke
Equipment |
Smoke grenade launchers
(8x 81-mm left side of turret), and 32 grenades.
Vehicle engine exhaust smoke system. |
ARMAMENT |
Main
Armament |
|
Caliber,
Type, Name |
125-mm smoothbore gun
2A46M/ D-81TM |
Rate of
Fire (rd/min) |
4-6/2 in manual mode |
Loader Type |
Autoloader (separate
loading) and manual |
Ready/Stowed
Rounds |
22/23 |
Elevation
(?) |
-6 to +14 |
Fire on
Move |
Yes, up to 25 km/h.
Depending on the road and distance to the target,
most crews may halt before firing. |
Auxiliary
Weapon |
|
Caliber,
Type, Name |
7.62-mm (7.62x 54R)
Machinegun PKT |
Mount Type |
Turret coax |
Maximum
Aimed Range (m) |
2,000 |
Max
Effective Range (m) |
|
Day |
1,000 |
Night |
800 |
Fire on
Move |
Yes |
Rate of
Fire (rd/min) |
250 practical, 600 cyclic
in 2-10 round bursts |
Caliber,
Type, Name |
12.7-mm (12.7x108) AA MG
NSVT |
Mount Type |
Turret top |
Maximum
Aimed Range (m) |
2,000 |
Max
Effective Range (m) |
|
Day |
1,500/1,000 antiaircraft |
Night |
N/A |
Fire on
Move |
Yes |
Rate of
Fire (rd/min) |
200 practical, 600 cyclic
in bursts |
ATGM
Launcher |
|
Name |
2A46M |
Launch
Method |
Gun-launched |
Guidance |
SACLOS, Laser beam rider |
Command
Link |
Encoded infrared laser
beam |
Launcher
Dismountable |
No |
FIRE
CONTROL |
FCS Name |
1A40-1 |
Main Gun
Stabilization |
2E42-2, 2-plane |
Rangefinder |
TPD-K1M laser rangefinder |
Infrared
Searchlight |
Yes |
Sights
w/Magnification |
|
Gunner |
|
Day |
TPD-K1, 8 |
Field of
View (?) |
9 |
Acquisition
Range (m) |
3,000 with LRF, 5,000
without |
ATGM/Night |
1K13-495 5.6x (8x ATGM) |
Field of
View (?) |
6, 40 min (5 ATGM) |
Acquisition
Range (m) |
INA |
Commander
Fire Main Gun |
No |
MAIN
ARMAMENT AMMUNITION |
Caliber,
Type, Name |
|
125-mm
APFSDS-T, BM-42M |
Maximum
Aimed Range (m) |
3,000 |
Max
Effective Range (m) |
|
Day |
2,000-3,000 |
Night |
850-1,300 |
Armor
Penetration (mm) |
590-630 at 2,000 meters |
125-mm
Frag-HE-T, OF-26 |
Maximum
Aimed Range (m) |
5,000 |
Max
Effective Range (m) |
|
Day |
INA |
Night |
850-1,300 |
Armor
Penetration (mm) |
INA |
125-mm
HEAT-MP, BK-29M |
Maximum
Aimed Range (m) |
3,000 |
Max
Effective Range (m) |
|
Day |
INA |
Night |
850-1300 |
Armor
Penetration (mm) |
650-750 |
125-mm
HEAT, BK-27 |
Maximum
Aimed Range (m) |
3,000 |
Max
Effective Range (m) |
|
Day |
INA |
Night |
850-1,300 |
Armor
Penetration (mm) |
700-800 |
Other
Ammunition Types |
Giat 125G1 APFSDS-T,
Russian BM-42 |
and BM-32
APFSDS-T. Note |
The Russians may have a
version of the BM-42M with a DU penetrator. |
Antitank
Guided Missiles |
|
Name |
AT-11/SVIR |
Warhead
Type |
Shaped charge (HEAT) |
Armor
Penetration (mm ) |
700 behind ERA/800
conventional |
Range (m) |
4,000 |
Name |
AT-11B/INVAR |
Warhead
Type |
Tandem Shaped charge
(HEAT) |
Armor
Penetration (mm ) |
800 behind ERA /870
conventional |
Range (m) |
4,000 |
Text is available under
the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License
|